What is IMF’s Secret Strategy, Finding Profit in Political Conflict Between India and Pakistan?

Abhijit Das | Sun, 11 May 2025
In 2025, the India-Pakistan conflict triggered economic turmoil, leading both nations to seek IMF loans. While the IMF claims to stabilize economies, its conditions often worsen the financial crisis, stripping countries of sovereignty and favoring global capital over local welfare. This article explores how the IMF profits from instability and highlights the need for people-first diplomacy and regional cooperation, calling for a shift from war-driven economies to peace-driven progress.
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Photo:
When bombs drop, most of the world grieves—but in certain glass-walled boardrooms, chaos can look like opportunity. As India and Pakistan edge dangerously close to conflict in 2025, one powerful player quietly observes from the sidelines: the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Image Div
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
This isn’t about conspiracy theories—it’s the harsh reality of how economics and geopolitics often move hand in hand.

The Battlefield of Economics: Why the IMF Watches Wars Closely

War doesn’t just take lives—it wrecks economies. It disrupts supply chains, sends inflation soaring, and leaves governments drowning in debt. And when that happens, guess who shows up?
That’s right—the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The recent 2025 border tensions between India and Pakistan have triggered alarm across the world. But in the middle of the fear and uncertainty, it's worth asking: who actually gains when countries are pushed to borrow billions?
Wars often force countries to seek financial lifelines—not because they want to, but because they have no choice. Defense budgets balloon, currencies crash, investors pull out. In desperation, nations turn to the IMF, which offers emergency loans—but with strict strings attached.
Image Div
India and Pakistan
It’s a bit like handing a thirsty man a glass of water, then asking for the deed to his house.

The India-Pakistan Conflict: Economic Consequences in Focus

By 2025, both India and Pakistan are feeling the financial strain of their escalating conflict. In just the first quarter of the year, military budgets on both sides jumped over 15%, pulling money away from essential services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
For Pakistan, the situation is especially dire. With its foreign reserves running dangerously low, the country turned to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in March 2025. The result?
A $6 billion bailout—but it came with heavy strings attached:
Subsidies on fuel and electricity were sharply reduced.
Image Div
Currency
The Pakistani rupee was devalued, making everyday imports—especially food—much more expensive.
In short, ordinary people are paying a steep price: once for the cost of war, and again for the cost of trying to recover from it.
India, though in a stronger financial position, hasn’t escaped unscathed. Investors are pulling out, markets are jittery, and the country’s fiscal deficit is growing. India hasn’t sought IMF help yet—but if tensions worsen, some believe it may be forced to.
History has a way of repeating itself, often in unsettling ways. When we look at recent global events, a familiar pattern emerges—one that connects war, economic collapse, and international financial intervention.

A Pattern Repeated: War, Debt, Dependency

Take Ukraine in 2022, for example. Amidst the ongoing conflict, the International Monetary Fund stepped in with a $15.6 billion loan. But this financial support wasn’t without strings attached. The aid came with a mandate for deep economic restructuring—changes that would significantly reshape the country's economy.
A similar story unfolded in Iraq after 2003. Following the U.S.-led invasion, the country underwent sweeping economic “reforms” heavily influenced by the IMF. These changes often favored Western investors, opening up Iraq’s markets while leaving many of its citizens struggling with the consequences.
Then there’s Sri Lanka in 2022. As the country faced a full-blown economic collapse, the IMF once again entered the scene. What began as a crisis soon became another chapter in the global playbook of financial intervention, complete with austerity measures and restructuring demands.
Image Div
Pakistan Govt Seeks Funds After Attacking India
What ties these situations together is a recurring pattern: crisis strikes, and in its wake comes conditional support. While labeled as “aid,” this support often serves as a vehicle for deeper economic control and long-term dependency. It’s a cycle that raises serious questions about who truly benefits—and who pays the price.

The Human Cost: When Help Turns into a Trap

Let’s be honest—no parent should have to worry about feeding their kids because wheat prices shot up. And no student should be forced to quit school just because fuel costs make the daily commute impossible. But for many, that’s exactly what happens under IMF-driven austerity plans.
Image Div
Pakistan in poverty
In today’s Pakistan, power cuts are a daily headache. In rural India, rising prices are making even basic survival harder. While everyday people bear the brunt, the IMF focuses on making sure wealthy creditor nations get their money—sometimes at the cost of new schools, hospitals, or basic services that communities desperately need.

What if we flipped the narrative we've grown used to in South Asia?

Instead of war zones, imagine the region as a network of collaborative economic zones. Picture India and Pakistan not as rivals, but as partners—co-investing in modern infrastructure, clean energy projects, and innovative startups that could reshape the region's future. Think of micro-lending institutions across the subcontinent, grounded not in coercion or dependency, but in mutual trust and shared goals.
Image Div
brics
Of course, turning this vision into reality would mean breaking free from the entrenched cycle of external dependency. And that’s precisely what institutions like the IMF might fear. Because the less we fight, the less we borrow. And the less we borrow, the less leverage they hold.

A Wake-Up Call for Young People, Voters, and Thoughtful Individuals

This isn't just about tanks or political agreements—it's about your future job opportunities, your everyday expenses, your mental well-being, and your personal freedom.
Every time we get used to the idea of war, we let economic opportunists into our lives. Every time we talk about foreign loans as if they’re a lifeline, we're slowly giving away more of our independence.
This affects you, too.

Choose Peace Over Profit in Times of War

The IMF doesn’t initiate wars, but it doesn’t seem to mind them either. For them, every shot fired represents a financial calculation, and every displaced family is another potential loan agreement.
But we are more than just numbers on a spreadsheet. We are human beings—each with our own hopes, struggles, and dreams. It’s time to call out this harmful cycle and demand a future that isn’t built on the profits of conflict.
In 2025, we have the power to decide. Will we continue to be pawns in someone else’s quest for wealth, or will we unite to create a future based on peace, not war? Let’s make the right choice.

Unlock insightful tips and inspiration on personal growth, productivity, and well-being. Stay motivated and updated with the latest at My Life XP.
Tags:
  • imf
  • india-pakistan war 2025
  • economic crisis
  • imf loans
  • debt leverage
  • global capitalism
  • war economics
  • peace diplomacy
  • financial instability
  • south asia economic impact

Read More

Latest Stories

Featured

Discover the latest trends in health, wellness, parenting, relationship, beauty, fashion, travel, and more. Your complete guide of lifestyle tips and advices