Why Our Sticky Love’ actor Ha Young’s Great-Grandfather Is Suddenly Under Scrutiny

Ha Young’s career was entering an important new phase. After gaining attention through The Trauma Code: Heroes on Call, the actor stepped into her first major leading role in Netflix’s Our Sticky Love alongside Jung Hae In. But just as the new romantic comedy arrived, an unexpected controversy began drawing attention away from the series.

The trigger was not something Ha Young allegedly did herself. Instead, it was a historical record concerning her great-grandfather, Dr Ahn Sang Ho. What began as a conversation about her family’s medical legacy quickly turned into a much bigger debate about Korea’s painful colonial past, historical responsibility and the complicated shadow family history can cast on public figures.

Ha Young appeared on Problem Child in House on August 7 and spoke about her family’s long medical tradition. She said her great-grandfather had studied Western medicine in Japan, opened a Western-style clinic in Hanyang and had reportedly treated Emperor Gojong. Although she did not name him during the programme, online discussion soon connected the story to Dr Ahn Sang Ho. That identification changed the conversation almost overnight. Instead of focusing only on a remarkable medical family history, attention shifted toward historical records surrounding Ahn’s activities during Japanese colonial rule.

The most serious point of scrutiny concerns a 1916 record that listed Ahn Sang Ho as a council member of the Daejeong Chinmokhoe. Historical research has described the organisation as supporting Japan-Korea assimilation and endorsing aspects of the Japanese colonial administration. Reports have also revisited earlier newspaper material concerning Ahn’s adoption of Japanese customs. These records have fuelled criticism because Korea’s colonial history remains an especially sensitive subject, particularly around National Liberation Day. However, the historical claims concern Ahn Sang Ho, not actions personally committed by Ha Young.

The controversy became more complicated when Ha Young’s agency initially described the reports as groundless. A day later, however, the agency said it had conducted further verification and confirmed that a historical record did list Ahn Sang Ho as a council member of the organisation in 1916. The agency apologised for making its first statement without enough verification. That reversal became an important part of the story because the public was no longer debating only the historical allegations. Attention also turned toward how quickly the agency had responded before checking the available records.

For Ha Young, the timing could hardly be more difficult. Our Sticky Love represents an important step in her career, but promotional plans have reportedly been affected by the controversy. A round-table interview scheduled for August 14, one day before National Liberation Day, was reportedly cancelled. Reports have also said that some promotional material featuring Ha Young was made private or had its replay availability changed. The developments show how quickly a historical controversy involving an ancestor can become a present-day career issue for a public figure.

At the heart of the controversy is a difficult question: how much responsibility should a descendant carry for an ancestor’s actions? Ha Young did not live during the colonial period, and the available reports do not accuse her personally of participating in any wrongdoing. At the same time, Korea’s history of Japanese occupation gives such allegations an emotional weight that cannot easily be separated from public discussion. This makes the situation more complicated than a simple celebrity scandal. It involves memory, identity, historical accountability and the expectations placed on people whose family histories suddenly become public.

The timing also matters because Ha Young has several significant projects ahead. She is expected to appear with Lee Je Hoon in SBS’s upcoming legal detective drama There’s a Winning Chance, while reports have also indicated plans for her return to The Trauma Code: Heroes on Call. SBS has said the production involving Lee Je Hoon has already completed a significant portion of filming and that the company is monitoring the situation. For now, there has been no indication that the controversy automatically ends Ha Young’s upcoming career plans, but the public response could influence how those projects are promoted.

The immediate focus is likely to remain on historical verification, public reaction and how Ha Young and her agency handle the situation. The agency has already shifted from denial to acknowledgement and apology, while Ha Young has expressed regret that her comments unintentionally led to controversy. The situation also highlights a wider lesson for celebrities: when personal family history enters the public spotlight, even an innocent story can trigger questions that demand careful historical research. For Ha Young, the challenge now is not simply protecting a new drama. It is navigating a sensitive chapter of her career with transparency and caution.

Ha Young’s controversy is ultimately about more than a television appearance or an upcoming Netflix drama. It demonstrates how unresolved historical memories can suddenly enter modern celebrity culture. Her great-grandfather’s documented history is now being examined alongside her own public career, even though the two generations lived in completely different circumstances. As the debate continues, the distinction between historical accountability and inherited blame will remain central. For Ha Young, one family story has unexpectedly become a national conversation, and what happens next may determine whether the controversy becomes a lasting career setback or a difficult chapter she eventually moves beyond.

Unlock insightful tips and inspiration on personal growth, productivity, and well-being. Stay motivated and updated with the latest at My Life XP